|
Dear Alan,
I stand corrected. I should have said you are in a
Party of One and Bill Ryan is in another Party of One. FOR EVER.
It is amazing -- planet 13 stuff -- that you are
refusing to accept that Bill Ryan deletes messages to the social credit
elist. He used to delete mine without informing me. Now he does so,
without giving a reason, BUT TELLS ME, bless him.
And only yesterday, John Hermann on this Ownerhsip list
said so as well.
So what's up with you? Do you want me to
keep forwarding the deletion messages to this list? I've already sent one
as an example and given the number (14) of my recently deleted
messages.
Moreover, I keep repeating my estimate of 200 messages
or so deleted by Ryan but he -- who always disputes everything -- does not
dispute the estimate because he knows it is either roughly right or -- much more
likely -- a considerable underestimate. In fact (you've got to give Ryan
credit for a mad sort of courage) I bet he will eventually say he has deleted,
say, five hundred or so emails, and he's proud of it and doesn't care a damn.
(Come on, Bill, go for it!! There's no need to be shy!!)
Alright, so you think the deletions on
Social Credit are irrelevant.
So kindly explain why ANY of Ryan's emails to
Ownership are relevant since they are not about capital ownership.
You can't, can you? So
you've lost the relevance argument. Full stop.
Rodney Shakespeare.
PS. I called you gutless because anybody knowing
that Ryan deletes must be gutless if they are not prepared to point out his
hypocrisy. However, you claim not to know that Ryan deletes, even though
the evidence has been given recently on this list. So you are merely an
amnesiac and a muddle-head.
And don't try any good ole southern boy stuff with me,
you rum-sodden cattle stealer. As a general rule, "simpering"
Brits have got the measure of loud-mouth Yanks. You couldn't have
pulled off the Falklands campaign, could you? With equal resources,
we can wipe you any day.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2005 12:09
AM
Subject: Re: OWNERSHIP: Ownership
Moderator
There you go again, Rodney.
Party of two? Hell, I'm a party of one. I have no relationship whatsoever
with Bill Ryan other than subscribing to his Social Credit list. And I could
care less whether he's deleting your messages or not. I suspect that he is
not. I haven't seen any evidence to the contrary. I believe in Ryan's
basic integrity. I also believe in the ineptitude of Elistas and other
listserves. ha ha ha.
Gutless? I will not justify that dig with any response other
than...you don't know me well enough to know if I'm gutless or not. On what
basis have you decided I'm gutless? Are there any particular instances
of cowardess in my personal life that you can point to? Ah, I suspected
as much, you don't know a damn thing about me. Let me just say that I'm a
southern boy, and we like to kick a little "a" every now and then just for the
pure heck of it when people are consistently uncivil, as you are. he he
he There ain't enough dogs, liberals or law enforcement that can keep a
southern boy off some smarmy self-righteous edjamakated fool.
It's nice to hear of your dialogue with social creditors. I could care
less. In fact, you could be right about everything: BE is the divine Sophia's
gift to suffering humanity, Bill Ryan is a sniveling socred troll, Big Al
Avans is gutless and has no social graces and he scratches himself and picks
his nose hairs and wears combat boots and bloomers, Bill Ryan is deleting your
messages to the Social Credit e-list, etc. etc. and I still don't give
a jiminy flip what you have to say because you're a simpering little
jerk. The Ownership list is the Ownership list, the Social Credit
list is the Social Credit list. Don't get confused about that. Why should
anyone on the Ownership list care to see your grievances with the Social
Credit list? Tell me, boy. ho ho ho and a bottle of rum.
Regards, sort of
Alan Avans
hey Rod, that's "Big Al" to you buster.
|