OWNERSHIP: Kurland's Con Game

["William B. Ryan" <w_b_ryan@yahoo.com>]

Moulton mischaracterized Douglas's A+B theorem, and
YOU mischaracterize Say's law to mean something quite
different than what Moulton meant by the term--thereby
mixing apples with oranges.

Say's law is called a law by economists due to its
allegedly automatic nature, that demand allegedly
automatically equates to supply.

You, in your typically quirky "binary" Kelsoist
oddball definition, redefine Say's law to mean that if
we consciously manipulate things in such a way
suggested by the Kelsoists, demand will equate to
supply.

So, when you use commonly understood terms like Say's
law, they mean something quite different in your
peculiar language.

Therefore, in your con game, you can "prove" anything
you want.
-



--- "Norman G. Kurland" <thirdway@cesj.org> wrote:

> Dr. Harold Moulton, president of the Brookings
> Institute during the 
> Depression, offered the clearest statement (see
> below) I've seen to 
> explain why no nation would ever substitute Major
> Douglas' A+B theorem 
> for Say's Law.
[snipped]


                
____________________________________________________ 
Yahoo! Sports 
Rekindle the Rivalries. Sign up for Fantasy Football 
http://football.fantasysports.yahoo.com
To subscribe to this or another of COG's discussion groups register at:
http://cog.kent.edu/register.html
To unsubscribe from this group send a message to majordomo@cog.kent.edu
with a single line in the body of the message that says:
unsubscribe ownership