COG

Homestead Discussion


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: HOMESTEAD: Fwd: Update on chat w/ King of Sen. Corzine's office



Deb,
Noting the reference in your copy letter to the Enron stock situation, here is one summary report of the situation that has hit employees' 401K and other arrangements.  It is a scandal of corporate governance and underlines the need for employees to have a defining say over what happens to their own money - rather than allow company managements, or pension fund managers, to treat their employees future income as if it were a corporate slush fund.  It is the best argument against employee stock ownership without employee participation in its control that I can think of.
Vic
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-homestead@cog.kent.edu [mailto:owner-homestead@cog.kent.edu]On Behalf Of Deborah Groban Olson
Sent: 05 December 2001 23:17
To: Homestead
Subject: HOMESTEAD: Fwd: Update on chat w/ King of Sen. Corzine's office

Dear Homesteaders:
        Attached is a portion of the email I sent Gene Fisher of Congresswoman Carolyn Cheeks-Kilpatrick's office regarding the Fair Exchange (SQPQ) proposals I have been working on at his request. Based on my discussions with him and Senator Levin's staff, I was asked to send the proposals to Senator Corzine who drafted the Airline Bailout bill proposals on equity compensation for the government. I would appreciate your thoughts on how to craft these proposals to meet the needs of the policy makers as expressed by them. The actual requested language I sent to Fisher and King are  in my last posting to Homestead addressed to David Ackerman of the ESOP Association Legislative and Regulatory Committee.
Deb
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2001 18:06:43 -0500
From: Deborah Groban Olson <dgo@esoplaw.com>
Subject: Update on chat w/ King of Sen. Corzine's office

Dear Gene:

        Today I spoke with Bruce King of Sen. Corzine’s office. He understands the idea that global hegemony is moving from nation states to corporations and why that is a problem for democracy. He is willing to look at proposals. He is not interested in pushing stock ownership right now when the market is down. He feels that now is a bad time to push ESOPs because so many people, including employees, lost their shirts in Enron stock, etc. (I think he said that employees were obliged to own stock at Enron.)

        He also thinks that if the government gets reimbursed by corporations for government investments, all taxpayers benefit. I think that is true on the macro level.  However, it is dependent on how the government, at any particular time, allocates those funds. An equity stake to the government doesn't do enough to build a second stream of income for citizens or give them voting rights in the increasingly powerful corporations.

        Now , when global companies are needy and coming to the US government to invest in them, is an opportunity to get US citizens a needed financial stake in the global economy. This investment stream of income will be increasingly important in for all US citizens in the near future. Now that the Social Security Fund is expected to be underfunded in 15 years and both  technology and globalization are decreasing the number of US jobs needed to produce goods sold in the US, wage income, social security insurance or individual development accounts will not be an adequate source of sustenance for an increasing number of Americans. Perhaps the forum in which to join this issue is not employee ownership, but instead social security, unemployment or trade.

        Congress should not miss out on this opportunity. During the next stock market upturn, the companies will not need government help. During the following downturn the process of corporate hegemony will likely have progressed.

        Bruce King is willing to look at more proposals, but he wants the draft proposal to have more timely political resonance that does not smell of underwater stock options,  and devalued ESOP stock.

        Do you have any reaction to:
        1) The proposals I sent in the email to King.
        2) These comments on King's reaction.
        3) How to frame the issue to make it politically attractive?


Many thanks for your time and interest.
Deb Olson

Deborah Groban Olson
Attorney at Law
of counsel to
Jackier, Gould, Bean, Upfal & Eizelman, P.C.
1021 Nottingham Road
Grosse Pointe Park, MI
Phone:(313) 331-7821
Fax:  (313) 331-2567
Email: dgo@esoplaw.com
Web site: www.esoplaw.com for information on employee ownership, equity compensation, and capital strategies, www.jackiergould.com for information on general business law practice.

This message is intended for the sole use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.



Attachment: Enronpensions.doc
Description: MS-Word document