|
COG
|
EOpriv Discussion |
|||||||||
| |
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: Please help with this paper
Dan I am not able to call up the paper you referred to.However;, I do agree with all of the obstacles you list. I think that there is another, based on an experience with my wifes brother, who spent his mqrketing career selling power genetating equipment to power companies. Then when the government begaqn to deregulate power companies (I think that is not totally unlike privitizing) guys like him were hired to help market the power products. He found a mindset on the part of management which had little orno concept how to mqnqge in that unregulated enviornment. If there had been the issue of turning the organization into an employee owned company immediately, it might have resulted in chaos. It would seem to me that it might make sense for the organization to get on it's feet identify it's market and customers and competitors and make a profit before creating anESOP. In order to help orient employees to ownership a stock purchase, or stock option plan could be offered. As for employee lack of interest there are probably are as many reasons for this as there are employees who are not interested. I have not yet read Shaan's paper on employee governance,so this next comment may not be appropriate for his view. In principle I would support more workplace democracy. In implementing this however, it has been my experience that Once employees realize that they are expected help in the decision and control, some grab on real fast, some remain sceptical and a few, including some lower management never buy in. Hope this adds a bit to the discussion. Don Ward From: Dan Bell <dbell@kent.edu> >Reply-To: EOpriv@cog.kent.edu >To: eopriv@cog.kent.edu >Subject: Please help with this paper >Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 10:30:12 -0500 > >One of the goals of bringing together members of the >Capital Ownership Group to discuss the use of employee ownership >in privatization, is to develop recommendations for improving >its use. >) >An outcome of the listserv "Employee Ownership in Privatizatioon" >(eopriv@cog.kent.edu) is a paper which collects our recommendations >for making employee ownership more successful as a tool of >privatization. > >I have begun a draft of this paper. The draft tries to focus >the scope of the paper on obstacles to the successful use >of employee ownership in privatization and then generate >ideas for what different roleplayers can do to overcome >these obstacles. > >The role players are: >International donors/lenders >National governments >Regional credit institutions >Regional technical assistance organizations >Labor organizations >Employees > >The obstacles are: >Privatization agencies unwilling to sell to employees >Lack of employee interest/support >Lack of competent management >Lack of a viable market >Inefficient operation/technology >Lack of labor/management cooperation >Unavailability of financing for growth > >Please review the paper and offer feedback and ideas >on filling out the section for overcoming obstacles. >The DRAFT can be found at: >http://cog.kent.edu/lib/privitization.htm > >Thanks for your help > >Dan >-- >Dan Bell >International Program Coordinator >Ohio Employee Ownership Center >Kent State University >Kent, OH 44242 >(330) 672-3028 >(330) 672-4063 fax >dbell@kent.edu >http://www.kent.edu/oeoc/ >http://cog.kent.edu ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
|